Straight answers

There are three plans and the first one is free for good. Free reads your whole feed and scores 5 roles a day against your resume, with the reasons attached, plus one resume review, one tailored resume and one cover letter a day. The two paid plans take the daily caps off, add the job-description check, add the morning message, and let your AI assistant put together everything an application needs. The cheaper one covers your own market. The dearer one adds roles abroad that say they sponsor or relocate. A pass buys 30 or 90 days and does not auto-renew, so there is nothing to cancel. Current prices are on the pricing page. The 15-day trial we ran for three days at the end of August is withdrawn, and Free is what replaced it. The Boolean search builder is still free for everyone and still needs no account.

It works today, every morning, and it keeps getting better. We ship most weeks: new sources go in, scoring gets tuned against real feedback, and the matching gets sharper for the fields our users actually work in. That is the deal on purpose. A job market that changes every quarter is not something you serve with software that was finished once. If a score ever looks wrong to you, tell us . Those reports go straight into the scoring, and they are the fastest way it improves.

Curated, as in read and chosen for you rather than listed. Every job board on earth competes on how many listings it can put in front of you. That's volume, and it's all your problem to sort through. Curation is the opposite bet: read the pile so you don't have to, score what's left against your resume, and only speak up when something is genuinely worth your time. A better decision comes from less, chosen well, not more. The Q is a deliberate misspelling. It is a curation product with an AI doing the curating, and the name says both.

No. Our scoring model is a Grok foundation model fine-tuned on Azure AI Foundry against resumes and job descriptions; customer resumes are not part of that training set. Your resume is used to score jobs for you and to tailor your applications. That is what you're paying for. It never carries your name or your email into the matching engine: the profile the pipeline works from is PII-free by construction, keyed by an opaque id. And when you delete your account, the resume and the profile go with it. See privacy for the specifics.

No. Telegram is completely optional and you can skip it at signup, link it months later, or never link it at all. Nothing about your account, your matching or your plan depends on it. Here is exactly what you get on each channel: Email, always on. Your morning message goes to the address you signed up with, carrying the day's strongest role and a count of the others waiting for you. This is the guaranteed channel and you cannot end up with no delivery. Your dashboard, always on. Everything we scored for you is on your feed, including the jobs that didn't clear the bar, with the reason each one was held back. That is where the rest of the day's roles live, and nothing is only ever in a message. Telegram, if you want it. The same message on your phone rather than in an inbox, with a thumbs-up and a thumbs-down button on it so you can teach the scoring what you actually want. That feedback is the only thing you can't do from an email. We used to require it, and we were wrong to. It made people who don't use Telegram (or don't want a job hunt on the same app as their friends) bounce off a signup they'd otherwise have finished.

Link it from your account page whenever you like. It's one tap on a bot link and it takes about five seconds. Your email digest carries on either way. You'll be assigned one of our bots, and that's the one you stay on. If you're wondering why there are several: Telegram rate-limits each bot, so we run a pool and spread users across it. It means a busy morning still delivers on time, and one bot having a bad day doesn't take everybody's alerts down with it.

Once every morning. The message carries the day's strongest role, with its score and the reasons behind it, and tells you how many more are waiting on your feed, so a quiet day still reports in rather than leaving you wondering whether it broke. We don't promise a precise minute. The run starts early and takes as long as it takes, so it lands sometime in the morning rather than on the dot.

Only roles that hold up against your profile are scored into your feed, and there is no cap on how many that can be: a strong day is a long feed. In practice it's usually a handful, and some days it's none, which is the correct answer when nothing good was posted. What arrives as a message is one role, the strongest of that morning, and the rest of the day's scored roles wait on your feed in the app. A tool that sends you something every day regardless is a tool that has stopped filtering.

An ATS (applicant tracking system) is the software a company uses to run its hiring: Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workable and about seven others. When a company opens a role, it appears on their ATS first , because that's the system the recruiter actually types it into. Reaching a job board is a later, optional step that plenty of roles never take. Most ATS platforms expose a company's open roles as a machine-readable feed. QuratedAI polls 12,000+ of those feeds directly every morning, which is why you can see a role days before an aggregator lists it, and why you see roles that no aggregator will ever list. It also means the listing arrives with its full description rather than a truncated teaser, so the scoring has something real to read.

No. Coverage is deepest for India-based roles, for remote-friendly roles anywhere, and for EU and Japan roles that offer sponsorship. North American roles come through the company ATS feeds we poll directly, and that inventory skews heavily US and Canadian, so a US or Canadian search is well served by the same daily scan. Two things to know either way: we read company career pages rather than US-specific aggregators like Indeed or ZipRecruiter, and the run is on an India-morning schedule, so your digest lands overnight if you are in the Americas.

It's how well one job fits you , judged by an AI reading the full job description against your full profile: roles, skills in priority order, experience, locations, work mode, salary floor and your hard rules. The strongest matches are flagged urgent, and a weak one isn't sent at all. The scale is anchored with worked examples for your specific field, so it doesn't collapse into "everything is a 6" the way generic scoring does.

Yes, and it's a case we've deliberately built for. A generic matching engine tuned for backend engineers will reject every job with "sales" in the title. QuratedAI reads your resume, identifies your actual field, and rebuilds its title rules and its scoring scale around it. Be aware that the tech-only sources (Hacker News, Y Combinator, the remote dev boards) carry near-zero non-engineering roles. For non-tech profiles the value comes from company ATS feeds, the Indian job boards and targeted search.

Yes, with one caveat worth knowing up front. The model reads your resume, works out your actual field, and rebuilds its scoring scale around it, so a fresher isn't judged against a scale calibrated for someone with eight years, and a switcher is judged on the field they're moving to if their profile and rules say so. The caveat is source mix. Entry-level and non-engineering roles come mostly from company ATS feeds and the Indian job boards; the tech-only sources carry very few. And your experience bounds are enforced as plain logic before the AI is consulted, so a role demanding ten years won't reach you regardless of how well it reads.

No. Every posting you've been shown is remembered in your own private history, so a role reposted across four aggregators collapses to one, and yesterday's listings never come back.

Any time. Open the app, edit your profile, resubmit. The next morning's run uses the new version. If you don't upload a new resume, the analysis from your last upload is reused, so editing a city won't cost you your skill enrichment.

It will sometimes. It's a language model reading a job ad, and job ads lie by omission. That's why every alert shows its reasoning and its red flags rather than just a number. You're meant to sanity-check it in five seconds, not obey it. Your hard rules, though, aren't left to the model's judgement. Geography, experience bounds and blocklists are enforced by plain logic before the AI is ever consulted.

No, and it won't. Auto-applying is how you get blocklisted by good companies. QuratedAI finds and ranks; you decide and apply.